My humble little blog has been getting a fair amount of traffic lately by people who are directed towards my anti-cosmetics rant after employing search terms like “cosmetic testing: the against argument” and “people against cosmetics” (just two recent examples). I wrote the anti-cosmetics post because it’s an issue I’ve been thinking about recently and I wanted a venue in which to develop and express my opinions. I didn’t think of it as categorically different than any of my other blog posts, but now I wonder if I didn’t produce an infinitely plagiarize-able piece of writing.
Could it be that freshman English students across the country who have been assigned one of those standard PRO/CON controversial social issue paper on, say, animal testing or cosmetics, are turning to my blog as an ideal source for “borrowing” from?
I know that my own students, who are plagiarizers of the first degree, will steal language from any source on the web, from published academic books and articles to “buy your own paper” sites to some random dude’s homepage. So, personal opinion blog posts are fair game — more fodder for the “I don’t have to think if I can find it on the web” generation.
Having spent many hours of my life googling my students’ papers over the past few years, I’ve often stumbled across web pages put up by other academics, clearly for the use and benefit of their own students, but employed for nefarious ends by my own. I’ve wondered whether these academics are aware of how their websites are being used and even considered contacting them to let them know.
Here’s a mock email I might send:
—
Dear XXX,
Recently I discovered that one of my students had plagiarized from your website on [major author / text / historical period]. My student copied [a great deal / a small amount / the entirety] of the information provided on your site. It appears that you created the website for the use of your own students, perhaps to share your notes, to provide helpful contextual information, to direct their reading or research, or even to summarize the insights they developed during class discussion. These are all laudable pedagogical uses of the web. However, your site is now being misused by my students and, while the responsibility clearly rests upon my students to comply with academic standards and upon me to teach them how to locate and cite appropriate sources, it might also be worthwhile for you to either take down the site, if it is no longer in use, or, at the very least, remove it from internet indexes so it cannot be found by students like mine who simply google [major author / text / historical period] and easily find your site.
Sincerely, The Bittersweet Girl
—
What do you think? Too hostile? The hostility is generated by my cheatin’ students but eventually it tends to spill over onto anyone associated with their plagiarism, even the unknowing, innocent source.
But, come on, all those website academics put up a few years ago when the web seem so new and fresh, and then walked away and forgot about … leaving them as fair game for cheaters … it does piss me off. We don’t need to make it any easier for them.
Which leads me back to my blog post on cosmetics. I like that post. I spent a lot of time on it. It reflects my thinking process, the slow crystallization of my opinions. But, I’m very tempted to “poof” it, in the fear that there is some professor out there who’s unknowingly grading my blog.
Damn lazy students. As if the world isn’t going to hell already.

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 29, 2008 at 2:37 am
lesboprof
Your argument only makes sense if one doesn’t consider the web an appropriate source. I don’t agree with that. I would argue that students need to learn how to assess a website for its usefulness and accuracy. If the website has great material, why not actually use it and cite it?
Some essays on blogs have citations and research in them, and they are perfectly appropriate for citation in another paper. Other blogs are good places to start understanding a concept or idea.
Following your argument, one could say that all published essays and books should be destroyed, because they provide a source for cheaters. It just doesn’t make sense.
If I got your email, I would be utterly confused. I would tell you to tell your students that citation from a website is unacceptable for your papers, and that you will find out if they crib their materials from websites and fail them.
September 29, 2008 at 1:25 pm
bsgirl
I think perhaps the sarcastic tone I meant to convey did not come through in this post. I intended to point out the absurdity that web writers should have to police themselves in order to prevent plagiarism — as I am still considering doing with regards to my cosmestics post.
Although it is absurd, I am so frustrated by my attempts to get my students to use sources correctly and NOT PLAGIARIZE that sometime it does seem like the only solution is to put them in a sound-proof box with a pencil and sheet of paper to write. Telling my students that they cannot simply copy materials from the web and call them their own, warning about the consequences and even following through with failing many of them, is simply not working. I cannot stem the tide of cheating. But, that’s a rant for another day.
September 29, 2008 at 7:04 pm
Sisyphus
It sucks to think people are stealing your stuff, particularly a nonacademic post which is just you thinking and having beliefs (at least, I would be even more angry if people stole my opinions about why I loved Shaun of the Dead than if they took my argument about why Midsummer Night’s Dream is a tragicomedy (for example.))
I guess you could try writing in such a way that large chunks of your rants are unusable, and they would at least have to cut and paste your stuff more selectively? Gah.
Is anyone in your department a real hardass about plagiarism? I tell my students horror stories about this one prof’s Javert-like persecutions of students, and come in throughout the quarter with periodic updates, and that seems to freak the hell out of them. (or maybe they’re just good enough to get by me all the time.)
September 30, 2008 at 2:35 pm
squadratomagico
Another Shaun of the Dead fan – yay!
I have to say, I don’t really worry too much about plagiarism. In part, it’s because I assign papers that are hard to plagiarize — I always have fairly unique requirements, or assign texts that cannot easily be found discussed on the web. But I think, also, that some of the discussion about plagiarism is overblown. Buying or copying an entire paper: yes, that’s bad. But I know some people who freak out if one sentence, or even a phrase, is incorporated without attribution. This, I think, it disproportionate. In fact, I might go so far as to say that at least the plagiarizing student looked at some material, rather than going for the total bullshit-artist approach of students who seem to randomly open the assigned reading, quote a passage from it, then add a bunch of crap that has nothing to do with anything. The plagiarizer probably learned more.
Lastly, I can’t help but note that medieval sources plagiarize, proudly and confidently, all the time. The conservative nature of the tradition is to repeat, not to innovate. Perhaps my low-key attitude towards modern-day plagiarism has something to do with that… I think one can be engaging with the material, and thinking deeply about it, even when repeating someone else.
September 30, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Rachael
I had a student who turned in a paper that she had “borrowed” from the set of example papers put up by the director of composition as, you got it, examples.