I’ve said it before but it bears repeating: student evaluations are evil. They are an unreliable measure of whether a teacher is successful and, at least in my experience, have no practical value to the teacher either. I’ve never read any comment in my evals that made me say, “Gee, I should change my pedagogy to address this reasonable concern.” I have, however, been kept up at night stewing over some cheap, mean-spirited, or selfish complaint — the kind of complaint a disgruntled student scrawls off in a moment of pique and then completely forgets about, never knowing that it gets burned into the teacher’s very soul.
(I feel the need to add, in my defense, that this does not mean that I don’t care whether my classes go well, are successful, my students like me, etc. I care deeply about these things — as recent posts have demonstrated — but I don’t believe evals relay anything useful or helpful in this regards.)
I have always thought that one of the perks of having tenure is not having to read student evals any more because, as we all know, they really don’t matter to the those protected by the golden mantle. I had promised myself that, as soon as I got tenure, I would adopt the strategy of so many of my tenured colleagues and friends: toss those evals into a dark, dank corner and forget all about them. Ha ha!
It would seem I have jumped the gun. This year, as I was working on my yearly review and writing my self-evaluation statements about why I am so superior as a teacher, scholar, and outstanding citizen of my college community (fluff, fluff, fluff), I had an epiphany: Even though I do not yet have tenure, student evals still don’t matter. There is nothing in those evals at this point that is going to make any difference in either how I teach or how I am evaluated by my administration. In my very bones I know that if I have published enough and in the right journals/presses, I will get tenure — no matter what my students have to say about it. I looked on those envelopes full of evaluations with new eyes: they were meaningless to me. I could read them, stress about them, spend hours of my life brooding over what they say … or I could ignore them.
What liberation!
I turned in my yearly review, including the unopened envelops of student evals, with a song in my heart. I’m either on the right track, tenure-wise, or I’m not. I’ll find out soon enough but, in the meanwhile, I refuse to torture myself.
Oh yes, I’m giving myself permission. Go ahead, try it.

7 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 14, 2008 at 6:18 am
Flavia
Sweet liberation, indeed! Congratulations. Now set those babies on fire.
November 14, 2008 at 12:57 pm
historiann
Well, I don’t know about burning them (since you probably need them for tenure review, post-tenure review, and not to mention your annual salary exercise), but I like the back-of-the-file-drawer-blissfully-unopened strategy myself.
In my early teaching years, sometimes the evaluations had useful information. (This was before PowerPoint, so “please give us a lecture outline” was a useful comment, for example. I know it seems obvious, but I didn’t do that until a student back in the 1990s pointed it out.) But I agree with your point in the main, which is that students aren’t really qualified to evaluate our teaching in the ways that are the most helpful. What I get in my teaching evals now is mostly confirmation that I’m someone people rarely feel neutral about: some students really, really dig me, some students really resent me, but that’s not something I think I can or should do anything about.
November 14, 2008 at 1:38 pm
Belle
I do the back of the drawer thing. And the drawer? Not even within 15 feet of my office.
On my blog you asked about a word meter. Wander on over to my blog, or Crazy’s, and just click on the meter! It’ll take you – zap! – to the website.
November 14, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Clio Bluestocking
Sing hallelulia! I did the same thing. Never found anything of use in them, and, for every ten good remarks, the one nasty, critical one hurt sooo much worse than necessary. Why go through that?
Although, I confess to one or two bad ones that make me laugh to this day. “Too much focus on sleaze and horny detail,” is my favorite. Then the one that wrote on an evaluation for the first half of the U.S. survey: “why do we have to learn so much about slavery? Yes, it was bad, can we just move on and learn about the real history?” One student informed me that they were praying for my soul. Otherwise, nothing concrete to make the class better or my teaching better.
November 14, 2008 at 11:08 pm
squadratomagico
Count me in with the back-of-the-drawer crowd, too. When I first began teaching, I read them, and I did learn one thing that caused me to adjust my lecturing style. Apparently, when I first started out I often paused, while searching for the right words, and said “um.” I wasn’t even conscious of this; after reading that eval., I began to listen for myself saying that, corrected it, and became a much more fluid lecturer.
But that was the only thing I ever learned from teaching evals. Negative ones seldom do anything but rant: they never have reasons for the dissatisfaction, or offer constructive criticism. Once I got an obscene fantasy one, too: ick and double-ick. Finally, feedback from these things often is useless for another reason: opinion nearly always is divided. Half the class will say they hate having discussions, for instance, while the other half will say it’s the best part of the course. My conclusion is that I may as well do what I prefer.
November 16, 2008 at 4:19 pm
disenchanted
Last year, I got an evaluationt that said that “although I like Dr. Disenchanted, her outfits are distracting.” I spent many nights trying to figure that one out, seeing how I dress like a soccer mom. Then I remembered that I wore a sundress to class one day — and it showed a little too much cleavage. Oh well.
November 17, 2008 at 1:55 am
bsgirl
Ah ha! I am thrilled to learn I am not alone in throwing off the chains of eval oppression! Now I am forced to wonder: is there ANYONE out there that still does read them? Poor souls.
A highlight for me in the “these evals are so useless” category is from one semester in which I got my hair cut about half way through. I received so many comments about my new haircut (pro and con), it was unbelievable. I did not need to know that for 1/2 a semester all my students were filling up class time by mentally evaluating the quality of my haircut rather than listening to what I was saying.
(And it wasn’t even a particularly dramatic haircut. It wasn’t like I showed up one day with purple hair.)